For those new to our town, it may seem like a fairy tale - that, once upon a time, the District Attorney's office was willing to try to hold the Mayor accountable for reasons other than politics.
In the past, on this site, we've made flippant remarks about Tom McEnery's financial windfall from his time as Mayor. Today, we're going to give a little more background.
A downtown renaissance championed by San Jose Mayor Tom McEnery has helped his family's San Pedro Square property nearly triple in value since McEnery took office in 1983. Merc, April 10, 1987.
In 1987, in McEnery's seventh year in office, the Merc finally got around to noticing McEnery's increasing real estate wealth. His properties, including San Pedro Square, had begun to balloon in value. Not to worry, of course, as McEnery signed an agreement with the D.A.'s office after his election forbidding him from voting on projects within a mile of his property.
That agreement fell by the wayside when McEnery began, in 1988, voting on issues related to the coming San Jose Arena - located, as you know, a few hundred steps from San Pedro Square.
The D.A. stepped in. In an extraordinary move:
San Jose Mayor Tom McEnery, who led last year's fight for the city's $100 million arena project, has been barred from voting on most aspects of it because he has a conflict of interest, District Attorney Leo Himmelsbach said Tuesday. Merc, March 15, 1989.
The D.A. determined that McEnery's interests fell squarely within the realm of conflict barred by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and strong-armed McEnery into an agreement on his behavior moving forward.
To imagine the reaction from the Mercury News today on such an issue is fairly easy. Outrage, followed quickly by a call for censure. Depending, of course, on who was doing the conflicting.
At the time, the Mercury News editorial board took a shrugging attitude.
Basically, here's what it says: All the important things that already have been done, McEnery can't do; but most of the important things that remain to be done, McEnery can do -- as long as the city council says so. Well. We will all sleep better at night knowing that. Merc, March 20, 1989.
The Merc referred to it as "costly hair-splitting", despite the fact that even the initial action by the D.A. was reviewed to determine if it should be strengthened.
To this day, McEnery maintains ownership of the downtown properties. This is a fact that cannot be ignored - that a sitting Mayor explicitly ignored an agreement with the D.A.'s office in a way that profited him personally, and today continues to try to influence City leaders to his benefit. Ron Gonzales had nothing on this guy.
Worth noting, of course, McEnery's campaign for Mayor against Claude Fletcher in 1982. Central to that effort? Criticizing Fletcher's secrecy in his financial holdings.
Labels: hypocrisy, Tom McEnery